Byron Dawes v. Cole Jeter , 209 F. App'x 609 ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                    United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 05-4155
    ___________
    Byron Dawes,                            *
    *
    Appellant,                *
    *   Appeal from the United States
    v.                               *   District Court for the
    *   Eastern District of Arkansas.
    Cole Jeter, Warden, in his individual   *
    and official capacity as Ex-Warden      *
    at the Federal Correctional             *   [UNPUBLISHED]
    Complex-Low (FCCL-FC) at                *
    Forrest City, Arkansas; Jose Jimenez, *
    in his individual capacity as Health    *
    Services Administrator at FCCL-FC;      *
    Edna Prince, in her official and        *
    individual capacity as Chief Medical    *
    Officer FCCL-FC; Y Toro, in her         *
    individual capacity as Physician        *
    Assistant at FCCL-FC; E. Kineish,       *
    in his individual and official capacity *
    as Doctor at FCCL-FC; G. Toliver,       *
    in his individual capacity as R. N. at  *
    FCCL-FC; E. Taylor, in her individual *
    capacity as R. N. at FCCL-FC; Linda     *
    Sanders, Warden,                        *
    *
    Appellees.                *
    ___________
    Submitted: December 7, 2006
    Filed: December 21, 2006
    ___________
    Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Federal inmate Byron Dawes appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of
    summary judgment in his Bivens2 action. We agree with the district court that there
    is nothing in the record to support Dawes’s opinion that the medical care he has
    received is so inadequate as to amount to a constitutional violation. See Jolly v.
    Knudsen, 
    205 F.3d 1094
    , 1096 (8th Cir. 2000) (mere disagreement with course of
    medical treatment is insufficient to state Eighth Amendment claim); Dulany v.
    Carnahan, 
    132 F.3d 1234
    , 1240 (8th Cir. 1997) (where medical records indicate
    treatment was provided and physician affidavits indicate care was adequate, inmate
    cannot create fact question merely by stating he did not believe treatment was
    adequate).
    Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, but we modify the district court’s
    order to clarify that the dismissal does not count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern
    District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jerry
    W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
    2
    Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 
    403 U.S. 388
    (1971).
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-4155

Citation Numbers: 209 F. App'x 609

Judges: Smith, Magill, Benton

Filed Date: 12/21/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024