Theobald v. United States ( 1925 )

STONE, Circuit Judge.

This is a writ of error from a conviction upon an indictment charging Theobald to-be guilty of abstracting travelers’ checks in violation of section 5209, Rev. St. (Comp. St. § 9772). Those travelers’ checks were in the form following:

“Travelers’ Check.

“Signature of Holder No. C65321.

u

“The National City Bank of New York through its correspondents as per accompanying list

“50 Will pay to the order of.........50

“When not negotiated in the United States, this check is to be converted into local currency at the current buying rate for bankers cheeks on New York

“Fifty Dollars United States Currency

“When countersigned with the signature of the holder as shown above

“The National City Bank of New York “Countersignature

a

“This signature must agree with that of the holder as shown above

“J. A. Stillman, President.

“W. H. Tappan, Cashier.”

On the reverse side of which travelers’ cheek was the following directory matter, to wit:

“Wherever presented this cheek is to be considered as a draft on the National City Bank of Now York, New York.

“In countries where revenue stamps are required the amount of same is to be paid by the holder.”

These forms were deposited with the First National Bank of Ardmore, Okl., under an arrangement that made the depository responsible therefor and gave to it a stated commission for handling and issuing the cheeks to customers. The indictment charged (in a separate count as to each cheek) that Theobald “abstracted” the cheeks from the “funds and credits” belonging to the Ardmore Bank and thereafter transferred and put them in circulation.

The first point here urged is that the indictment is duplicitous because it charges that accused embezzled, abstracted, and willfully misapplied the travelers’ chocks whereas each one of these acts is a different offense. This objection is not well 'taken because the gravamen of this charge is the abstraction.

It.is also contended that the indictment is defective because it does not charge that accused did these things “without the authority from the directors.” The charge in the indictment is that the acts were done “without the knowledge or consent of the said National Banking Association or any person authorized to give such consent, and with the unlawful, fraudulent and felonious intent of him, the said Paul Ernest Theo-bald, to convert and appropriate the said cheek and the proceeds to be derived from the transfer and sale of same to his own use and benefit, and to permanently deprive the First National Bank of Ardmore of the said check and of the value thereof. * * * ” This is certainly. sufficient.

It is contended that these travelers’ cheeks were not “money, funds, or credits” within the meaning of the statute. We think “credits,” within the act, include papers intended to represent and which could perform and were intended to perform the function of credits. • Such was the character of these travelers’ cheeks. . .

The last point is that there was no evidence that the accused “abstracted” these cheeks. There was evidence that he did abscond and that he had.cashed these checks; also that he was employed in the bank and might have access to these checks. We think this is evidence of abstraction.

The judgment should be and is affirmed.