George Poole v. Gene Stubblefield , 216 F. App'x 607 ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 06-2240
    ___________
    George Poole,                          *
    *
    Appellant,                  * Appeal from the United States
    * District Court for the
    v.                                * Eastern District of Missouri.
    *
    Gene Stubblefield; Richard Dixon,      * [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellees.                  *
    ___________
    Submitted: February 6, 2007
    Filed: February 16, 2007
    ___________
    Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    George Poole appeals the district court’s1 dismissal without prejudice, under
    Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(b) and 37(d), of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit.
    Upon careful review of the record, we find no abuse of discretion in the court’s
    dismissal of Poole’s lawsuit for failure to comply with the court’s order directing him
    to respond to defendants’ discovery requests, and for his unexplained failure to attend
    his properly noticed deposition. See Good Stewardship Christian Ctr. v. Empire
    1
    The Honorable Thomas C. Mummert, United States Magistrate Judge for the
    Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
    consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
    Bank, 
    341 F.3d 794
    , 797 (8th Cir. 2003) (standard of review for Rule 41(b) dismissal);
    Aziz v. Wright, 
    34 F.3d 587
    , 589 (8th Cir. 1994) (standard of review for Rule 37(d)
    dismissal); Schooley v. Kennedy, 
    712 F.2d 372
    , 374 (8th Cir. 1983) (per curiam)
    (lesser sanction of dismissal without prejudice mitigates against finding abuse of
    discretion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. 47B.
    ______________________________
    -2-