United States v. Christopher A. Jones , 256 F. App'x 850 ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 06-3389
    ___________
    United States of America,                *
    *
    Appellee,                   *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                 * District Court for the
    * Eastern District of Arkansas.
    Christopher Adrian Jones,                *
    *      [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellant.                  *
    ___________
    Submitted: November 20, 2007
    Filed: December 4, 2007
    ___________
    Before BYE, RILEY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    The panel in this case directed supplemental briefing from the parties on the
    issue of whether the predicate felony offenses used to impose a mandatory life
    sentence under 
    18 U.S.C. § 3559
    (c) constituted three separate serious violent felonies.
    The parties have filed supplemental briefs. The government now concedes that 
    18 U.S.C. § 3559
    (c)(3)(A) precludes the use of the robbery convictions previously relied
    upon to impose the mandatory life sentence. The government also concedes that the
    use of the predicate offenses to impose a life sentence constitutes clear error and asks
    that the matter be remanded for resentencing without the mandatory life sentence.
    The sentence in this case is reversed and the matter is remanded to the district
    court for resentencing without the imposition of a mandatory life sentence under 
    18 U.S.C. § 3559
    (c). Based on the government’s concession that the robbery convictions
    are not valid predicate offenses for purposes of the imposition of a life sentence, the
    court expresses no opinion as to whether each of the offenses qualifies as separate
    convictions under 
    18 U.S.C. § 3559
    (c)(1)(B). Likewise, the court expresses no
    opinion as to the ultimate sentence to be imposed in this case, and no opinion as to
    whether the defendant qualifies as a career offender under the federal sentencing
    guidelines.1
    ______________________________
    1
    We also express no opinion as to whether the recent amendments to the federal
    sentencing guidelines dealing with separate sentences under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2 has any
    applicability to this case.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-3389

Citation Numbers: 256 F. App'x 850

Judges: Bye, Riley, Melloy

Filed Date: 12/4/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024