City of Kansas City v. Housing & Economic Development Financial Corp. , 258 F. App'x 907 ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                    United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 07-1488
    ___________
    City of Kansas City, Missouri     *
    *
    Appellee,             *
    *
    David Bahner,                     *
    *
    Appellee,             *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                * District Court for the Western
    * District of Missouri.
    Housing & Economic Development    *
    Financial Corporation,            * [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellee,             *
    *
    Rosehill Gardens,                 *
    *
    Defendant,            *
    *
    Miguel Tilley,                    *
    *
    Appellant.            *
    ___________
    Submitted: December 14, 2007
    Filed: December 21, 2007
    ___________
    Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Miguel Tilley challenges the district court’s1order denying his claim for federal
    housing relocation benefits. We affirm.
    After an evidentiary hearing, the district court denied Tilley’s claim for
    relocation benefits and personal property damages in this receivership action brought
    by the City of Kansas City, Missouri (City), against Housing Economic Development
    Financial Corporation (HEDFC). On appeal, Tilley challenges the district court’s
    credibility determinations and evidentiary rulings. The City and HEDFC urge this
    court to affirm and argue that Tilley’s failure to obtain a hearing transcript prevents
    consideration of his arguments on appeal. Tilley’s reply brief attempts to introduce
    new material and includes an untimely transcript request and an incomplete, unsworn
    financial affidavit, and HEDFC has moved to strike it.
    Without a transcript of the hearing, this court cannot review the district court’s
    factual findings or any issues involving witness credibility or evidentiary rulings. See
    Van Treese v. Blome, 
    7 F.3d 729
    , 729 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam); Schmid v. United
    Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am., 
    827 F.2d 384
    , 385-86 (8th Cir. 1987) (per
    curiam). In any event, credibility determinations are within the exclusive domain of
    the district court and are virtually unreviewable on appeal. See Chaganti & Assocs.
    v. Nowotny, 
    470 F.3d 1215
    , 1222 (8th Cir. 2006), cert. denied, 
    127 S. Ct. 2977
    (2007). Thus, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we deny Tilley’s
    untimely and incomplete transcript request. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(1). The motion
    to strike is denied as moot.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western
    District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable John
    T. Maughmer, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-1488

Citation Numbers: 258 F. App'x 907

Judges: Wollman, Colloton, Benton

Filed Date: 12/21/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024