-
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-1581 ___________ Michael Carmie Antonelli, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Michael Gaines, Chairman, United * States Parole Commission, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: April 5, 2007 Filed: April 10, 2007 ___________ Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Michael Carmie Antonelli appeals following the district court’s1 dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and denial of his motion for reconsideration. We conclude that the dismissal of the section 2241 petition was proper for the reasons explained by the district court, see United States v. Lurie,
207 F.3d 1075, 1076 (8th Cir. 2000) (de novo standard of review for § 2241 petition), and that the district court 1 The Honorable John F. Forster, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for reconsideration, see Davidson & Schaaff, Inc. v. Liberty Nat. Fire Ins. Co.,
69 F.3d 868, 871 (8th Cir. 1995) (abuse-of-discretion standard of review for reconsideration motion). Accordingly, we deny Antonelli’s motions on appeal, and we affirm the district court’s judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Document Info
Docket Number: 06-1581
Judges: Smith, Gruender, Shepherd
Filed Date: 4/10/2007
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/5/2024