United States v. Norman Hardesty , 172 F. App'x 697 ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 05-3314
    ___________
    United States of America,               *
    *
    Appellee,                   *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                * District Court for the
    * Western District of Missouri.
    Norman Hardesty,                        *
    *      [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellant.                  *
    ___________
    Submitted: March 13, 2006
    Filed: March 28, 2006
    ___________
    Before COLLOTON, HEANEY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Norman Hardesty pleaded guilty to two counts of being a felon in possession
    of firearms on two separate occasions, in violation of 
    18 U.S.C. § 922
    (g)(1). The
    district court1 sentenced him to 235 months of imprisonment to be followed by five
    years of supervised release. On appeal, Hardesty argues his Sixth Amendment rights
    to trial by jury and proof beyond a reasonable doubt were violated because his prior
    convictions which were used to enhance his sentence were neither admitted by him,
    nor proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
    1
    The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the
    Western District of Missouri.
    Although Hardesty concedes that his argument is contrary to Almendarez-
    Torres v. United States, 
    523 U.S. 224
     (1998), he contends that Blakely v.
    Washington, 
    542 U.S. 296
     (2004), and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S 466 (2000)
    severely undermine the holding of Almendarez-Torres that a district court is entitled
    to determine the nature and existence of a defendant’s prior convictions without
    submitting these issues to a jury. This court has repeatedly held since Blakely and
    United States v. Booker, 
    543 U.S. 220
     (2005), that the determination of the nature of
    a defendant’s prior offense is a legal question to be determined by the district court.
    See United States v. Kendrick, 
    423 F.3d 803
    , 810 (8th Cir. 2005); United States v.
    Camp, 
    410 F.3d 1042
    , 1047 (8th Cir.2005); United States v. Marcussen, 
    403 F.3d 982
    , 984 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 
    126 S. Ct. 457
     (2005). Accordingly, we affirm.
    ______________________________
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-3314

Citation Numbers: 172 F. App'x 697

Judges: Colloton, Heaney, Gruender

Filed Date: 3/28/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024