Bower v. Springfield R-12 School District , 263 F. App'x 542 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                    United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 06-3876
    ___________
    Mary Bower, next friend;               *
    *
    Plaintiff-Appellant,      *
    *
    Ariel Bower, Minor;                    *
    Gabrielle N. Lyon, Minor,              * Appeal from the United States
    * District Court for the Western
    Plaintiffs,               * District of Missouri.
    *
    v.                               * [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Springfield R-12 School District;      *
    Charrie Dixon; Janis Duncan; Jane      *
    Hancock; Susan Provance; School        *
    Board of Springfield,                  *
    *
    Defendants-Appellees.     *
    ___________
    Submitted: February 07, 2008
    Filed: February 13, 2008
    ___________
    Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Mary Bower appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment to
    defendants in her 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     action alleging violations of her First Amendment
    right to free speech, and defamation under state law. Bower also appeals the denial
    of her motion for appointed counsel, and the dismissal of her children as plaintiffs.
    After careful review of the record, we find no error in the district court’s grant
    of summary judgment, see Dulany v. Carnahan, 
    132 F.3d 1234
    , 1237 (8th Cir. 1997)
    (standard of review), and nothing to support Bower’s contention that the district court
    judge should have recused himself, see 
    28 U.S.C. § 455
    (a) (judge is required to
    disqualify himself in proceedings in which his impartiality might reasonably be
    questioned). We also find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying
    Bower’s motion for appointed counsel. See Butler v. Fletcher 
    465 F.3d 340
    , 346 (8th
    Cir. 2006) (standard of review). Thus, the district court did not err in dismissing the
    claims of Bower’s minor children, as Bower was unable to represent them pro se, see
    Myers v. Loudoun County Pub. Schs., 
    418 F.3d 395
    , 401 (4th Cir. 2005), but those
    claims should have been dismissed without prejudice.
    Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, but we modify the dismissal of the
    claims of Bower’s minor children to be without prejudice.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western
    District of Missouri.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-3876

Citation Numbers: 263 F. App'x 542

Judges: Bye, Smith, Benton

Filed Date: 2/13/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024