United States v. Reginald Irish , 285 F. App'x 326 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 06-4082
    ___________
    United States of America,                 *
    *
    Appellee,                    *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                  * District Court for the
    * Western District of Missouri.
    Reginald Irish,                           *
    * [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellant.                   *
    ___________
    Submitted: July 30, 2008
    Filed: July 31, 2008
    ___________
    Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Reginald Irish pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in
    violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). The district court1 sentenced Irish
    to 77 months in prison and 3 years of supervised release. On appeal, Irish’s counsel
    has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), and Irish has filed three pro se briefs. For the following reasons, we reject the
    arguments that they have raised.
    1
    The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western
    District of Missouri.
    First, the Second Amendment does not bar laws prohibiting felons from
    possessing firearms. See Dist. of Columbia v. Heller, 
    128 S. Ct. 2783
    , 2816-17
    (2008). Second, Congress did not exceed its authority or violate the Commerce
    Clause when it enacted section 922(g). See United States v. Hill, 
    386 F.3d 855
    , 859
    (8th Cir. 2004); United States v. Shepherd, 
    284 F.3d 965
    , 969 (8th Cir. 2002). Third,
    general federal criminal laws like section 922(g) apply nationwide. See Lewis v.
    United States, 
    523 U.S. 155
    , 171 (1998). Last, the required nexus between a firearm
    and commerce is established by showing that the firearm at one time traveled in
    interstate commerce. See United States v. Leathers, 
    354 F.3d 955
    , 959 (8th Cir.
    2004).
    After reviewing the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    ,
    80 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues. We grant counsel’s motion to
    withdraw, and deny Irish’s motions for appointment of new counsel and for a writ of
    habeas corpus ad testificandum. The judgment is affirmed.
    ______________________________
    -2-