Keith Brown El v. Unknown Giessing , 365 F. App'x 38 ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 08-1850
    ___________
    Keith Brown El,                    *
    *
    Appellant,              *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                           * District Court for the
    * Eastern District of Missouri.
    Unknown Giessing; R/O Doe I;       *
    Unknown Doe II, Sgt.; Unknown      *      [UNPUBLISHED]
    Jackson, DHO; Unknown Murphy,      *
    Nurse,                             *
    *
    Appellees.              *
    ___________
    Submitted: February 11, 2010
    Filed: February 17, 2010
    ___________
    Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Keith Brown El (Brown El), a Missouri inmate, moved to recall our mandate
    in this appeal, asserting this court incorrectly attributed to him “strikes,” within the
    meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), for lawsuits that were filed by a different Missouri
    inmate, also named Keith Brown El. Because we have determined Brown El is
    correct, and he did not have three qualifying strikes at the time he filed the instant
    appeal, we grant his motion to recall the mandate in this appeal, and we reinstate our
    previous grant of in forma pauperis status.
    Brown El appeals the district court’s1 dismissal without prejudice of his 42
    U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful review, we conclude the district court did not
    abuse its discretion in dismissing Brown’s action without prejudice for failure to
    comply with the court’s order directing him to file an amended complaint. See Smith
    v. Gold Dust Casino, 
    526 F.3d 402
    , 404-05 (8th Cir. 2008) (standard of review);
    Schooley v. Kennedy, 
    712 F.2d 372
    , 374 (8th Cir. 1983) (per curiam) (reasoning that
    a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) dismissal is without prejudice and this
    militates against finding abuse of discretion). We also find no abuse of discretion in
    the denial of Brown El’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. See Int’l Bhd.
    of Elec. Workers v. Hope Elec. Corp., 
    293 F.3d 409
    , 415 (8th Cir. 2002) (stating the
    standard of review and explaining Rule 60(b) authorizes relief in only the most
    exceptional of cases). We affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    _____________________________
    1
    The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Sr., United States District Judge for the
    Eastern District of Missouri, now retired.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-1850

Citation Numbers: 365 F. App'x 38

Judges: Riley, Smith, Benton

Filed Date: 2/17/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024