Byron Wallace v. Estella Bland , 592 F. App'x 540 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                  United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 14-2614
    ___________________________
    Byron L. Wallace
    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    Estella Bland; Dr. William Warren; Dr. Troy Moore
    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff
    ____________
    Submitted: January 30, 2015
    Filed: February 9, 2015
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Arkansas inmate Byron L. Wallace appeals the grant of summary judgment
    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims that two doctors and a nurse violated his
    Eighth Amendment right to adequate care and treatment of his diabetes condition at
    the Cummins Unit of the Arkansas Department of Corrections.
    After de novo review, we agree with the district court that Wallace’s claims
    against Nurse Estella Bland and Dr. Troy Moore were based solely on his
    disagreement with the course of treatment for his diabetes, and thus did not rise to the
    level of a constitutional violation. See Meuir v. Greene County Jail Employees, 
    487 F.3d 1115
    , 1118-19 (8th Cir. 2007). By failing to brief the issue, Wallace waived his
    objection to the district court’s1 conclusion that he failed to exhaust administrative
    remedies as to Dr. William Warren. See Hess v. Ables, 
    714 F.3d 1048
    , 1051 n.2 (8th
    Cir. 2013). We cannot review Wallace’s challenge to the magistrate judge’s denial
    of his motions for appointment of counsel, as Wallace filed no objections to these
    orders in the district court. See McDonald v. City of St. Paul, 
    679 F.3d 698
    , 709 (8th
    Cir. 2012). His final motion for counsel to the district court was untimely and
    unsupported. Finally, we decline to consider new matters raised for the first time on
    appeal, see Stone v. Harry, 
    364 F.3d 912
    , 914-15 (8th Cir. 2004).
    Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the
    Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the
    Honorable Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District
    of Arkansas.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-2614

Citation Numbers: 592 F. App'x 540

Judges: Loken, Colloton, Kelly

Filed Date: 2/9/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024