Stephen Marino v. Michael J. Astrue , 373 F. App'x 662 ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 09-3408
    ___________
    Stephen A. Marino,                    *
    *
    Appellant,                *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                               * District Court for the Eastern
    * District of Missouri.
    Michael J. Astrue,                    *
    Commissioner of Social Security,      * [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellee.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: April 7, 2010
    Filed: April 30, 2010
    ___________
    Before RILEY, Chief Judge, BYE, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Stephen A. Marino appeals following the district court’s1 order affirming the
    denial of disability insurance benefits (DIB) and supplemental security income (SSI)
    for the period from February 1999 to August 2004 (arising from a 1999 application);
    and reversing and remanding for further consideration of his 2005 SSI application.
    1
    The Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig, United States Magistrate Judge for the
    Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
    consent of the parties pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C. § 636
    (c).
    To the extent Marino has properly raised any issues for review concerning his
    entitlement to DIB and SSI from February 1999 to August 2004, see Meyers v. Starke,
    
    420 F.3d 738
    , 743 (8th Cir. 2005) (failure to present issues with some specificity can
    result in waiver), we agree with the district court that the ALJ’s opinion is supported
    by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, see McNamara v. Astrue, 
    590 F.3d 607
    , 610 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review). We decline to consider appellee’s
    challenge to the district court’s determination that reversal was warranted for further
    consideration of Marino’s 2005 SSI application, because appellee did not file a cross-
    appeal. See Smith v. Sullivan, 
    982 F.2d 308
    , 314 (8th Cir. 1992) (where appellee fails
    to file cross-appeal, he is prohibited from attempting to enlarge his rights or lessen his
    adversary’s rights). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-3408

Citation Numbers: 373 F. App'x 662

Judges: Riley, Bye, Shepherd

Filed Date: 4/30/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024