United States v. Brandon Smith-Cushingberry , 381 F. App'x 630 ( 2010 )

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 10-1186
___________
United States of America, *
*
Plaintiff - Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Nebraska.
Brandon Lamarr Smith-Cushingberry, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Defendant - Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: June 14, 2010
Filed: June 22, 2010
___________
Before BYE, CLEVENGER,1 and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Brandon L. Smith-Cushingberry appeals his sentence reduction granted by the
district court2 pursuant to the government’s motion under Federal Rule of Criminal
Procedure 35(b) to reduce his sentence based on his assistance with multiple
investigations. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
1
The Honorable Raymond C. Clevenger, III, Judge of the United States Court
of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.
2
The Honorable Warren K. Urbom, United States District Judge for the District
of Nebraska.
Smith-Cushingberry pleaded guilty, and was sentenced to sixty months
imprisonment followed by five years supervised release, to conspiracy to possess with
intent to distribute crack cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Smith-Cushingberry
cooperated with the government and provided information which led to the
prosecution of two individuals. Thereafter, the government filed a motion to reduce
Smith-Cushingberry’s sentence pursuant to Rule 35(b). The government provided
detailed information involving the nature of assistance provided by Smith-
Cushingberry. Following a hearing, the district court reduced Smith-Cushingberry’s
sentence to forty months imprisonment followed by five years supervised release. On
appeal, Smith-Cushingberry argues the sentence is unreasonable because the district
court did not give enough weight to his assistance and cooperation.
This court is without jurisdiction to review Rule 35(b) sentence reductions
unless one of four criteria are met under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a). United States v.
Haskins, 479 F.3d 955, 957 (8th Cir. 2007) (per curiam) (holding that jurisdiction over
appeal of a Rule 35(b) sentence reduction is governed by 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)). These
four criteria are:(1) the sentence was imposed in violation of the law, (2) the sentence
was imposed using an incorrect application of the sentencing guidelines, (3) the
sentence is greater than the applicable guidelines range, or (4) the sentence is imposed
for an offense without a sentencing guideline and is plainly unreasonable. 18 U.S.C.
§ 3742(a)(1)-(4). This court lacks jurisdiction to hear the appeal of the district court’s
ruling on the Rule 35(b) motion because Smith-Cushingberry’s claim does not satisfy
any of the criteria of § 3742(a). See United States v. Williams, 590 F.3d 579, 581 (8th
Cir. 2009) (“Because [defendant’s] claims do not satisfy any of the criteria listed in
18 U.S.C. § 3742(a), we conclude that they are unreviewable by this court.”).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
______________________________
-2-