Xavier Cravenwolfe v. Robert Carter , 670 F. App'x 903 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 16-2665
    ___________________________
    Xavier Cravenwolfe
    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    Robert Carter, ACI Director; Tim Lowery, ACI Furniture Factory Plant Manager;
    Randal Raper, ACI Furniture Factory Floor Manager
    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
    ____________
    Submitted: November 15, 2016
    Filed: November 29, 2016
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Arkansas inmate Xavier Cravenwolfe appeals after the district court1 dismissed
    his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     action without prejudice, following its determination that
    Cravenwolfe failed to exhaust administrative remedies.
    We conclude that the district court did not err in its determination, as the record
    showed beyond genuine dispute that Cravenwolfe omitted material information that
    was required on a grievance appeal form. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (no action shall
    be brought with respect to prison conditions under § 1983 by prisoner until such
    administrative remedies as are available are exhausted); King v. Iowa Dep’t. of Corr.,
    
    598 F.3d 1051
    , 1052 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review of district court’s interpretation
    of § 1997e(a)); see also Jones v. Bock, 
    549 U.S. 199
    , 218 (2007) (prison’s
    administrative exhaustion requirements govern whether exhaustion has occurred);
    Woodford v. Ngo, 
    548 U.S. 81
    , 90-91 (2006) (proper exhaustion demands compliance
    with prison’s deadlines and other critical procedural rules); Chelette v. Harris, 
    229 F.3d 684
    , 688 (8th Cir. 2000) (inmate’s subjective beliefs about grievance process
    cannot excuse exhaustion requirement).
    Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny as moot
    Cravenwolfe’s pending motion for appointment of counsel.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable James M. Moody Jr., United States District Judge for the
    Eastern District of Arkansas.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-2665

Citation Numbers: 670 F. App'x 903

Judges: Murphy, Colloton, Gruender

Filed Date: 11/29/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024