Addones Spencer v. Tara Hall , 583 F. App'x 599 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •               United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 14-2694
    ___________________________
    Addones Spencer
    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    Tara Hall, FCI-Forrest City
    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena
    ____________
    Submitted: November 21, 2014
    Filed: November 26, 2014
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Federal prisoner Addones Spencer appeals the district court’s1 dismissal
    without prejudice of his Bivens2 action against Tara Hall, for failure to exhaust
    administrative remedies. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs,
    we affirm.
    We first conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in
    dismissing without affording Spencer additional time for discovery, because he did
    not explain how further discovery would have helped him show that he had exhausted
    available remedies, or been prevented from doing so. Cf. Ray v. Am. Airlines, Inc.,
    
    609 F.3d 917
    , 922 (8th Cir. 2010) (abuse-of-discretion standard applies to district
    court’s determination that claim is ripe for decision). We further conclude that
    dismissal was proper because Spencer did not rebut Hall’s evidence that he had filed
    no grievance concerning the subject of his lawsuit, and he presented no evidence
    indicating that exhaustion was unavailable to him; on the contrary, the evidence
    established that he had filed thirty-three grievances unrelated to the claims in the
    present lawsuit. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (exhaustion requirement); Hammett v.
    Cofield, 
    681 F.3d 945
    , 948-49 (8th Cir. 2012) (per curiam) (claim that exhaustion is
    unavailable requires sufficient showing in record; evidence of prisoner’s previous use
    of grievance procedures is relevant); see also King v. Iowa Dep’t of Corr., 
    598 F.3d 1051
    , 1052 (8th Cir. 2010) (dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative remedies
    is reviewed de novo).
    Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern
    District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Beth
    Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
    2
    Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 
    403 U.S. 388
    (1971).
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-2694

Citation Numbers: 583 F. App'x 599

Judges: Gruender, Benton, Kelly

Filed Date: 11/26/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024