Steven Hill v. C V Rivera ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                  United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 18-3756
    ___________________________
    Steven E. Hill
    Plaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    C V Rivera, Warden
    Defendant - Appellee
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena
    ____________
    Submitted: September 27, 2019
    Filed: December 23, 2020
    ____________
    Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    BENTON, Circuit Judge.
    The district court1 dismissed Steven E. Hill’s habeas corpus petition under 
    28 U.S.C. § 2241
    . See Hill v. Rivera, 
    2018 WL 6182637
    , at *4 (E.D. Ark. Nov. 27,
    2018). He appeals. Having jurisdiction under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    , this court affirms.
    1
    The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern
    District of Arkansas, now retired.
    In 2012, Hill, then a Sergeant in the United States Army, was convicted after
    trial by general court-martial of a rape committed in 1998. At the time of his
    conviction and direct appeals, there was no statute of limitations for prosecution of
    rape under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). See, e.g., United States
    v. Stebbins, 
    61 M.J. 366
    , 369 (C.A.A.F. 2005); Willenbring v. Neurauter, 
    48 M.J. 152
    , 180 (C.A.A.F. 1998). In 2018, the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces held
    for the first time that a five-year statute of limitations applied to rape. See United
    States v. Mangahas, 
    77 M.J. 220
    , 222-24 (C.A.A.F. 2018).
    Hill appealed to this court, arguing the new five-year statute of limitations
    applied retroactively to invalidate his conviction. See Hill v. Rivera, 
    724 Fed. Appx. 511
    , 511-12 (8th Cir. 2018). This court remanded to the district court to consider
    the applicable statute of limitations in light of Mangahas. 
    Id. at 512
    . The district
    court dismissed the habeas petition, ruling Mangahas inapplicable. Hill, 
    2018 WL 6182637
    , at *1. Hill again appeals.
    This month, in United States v. Briggs, the United States Supreme Court
    abrogated Mangahas, thus voiding the premise of Hill’s appeal. See United States
    v. Briggs, 
    2020 WL 7250099
    , at *2 (U.S. Dec. 10, 2020) (holding there is no statute
    of limitations under the UCMJ for rapes committed between 1986 and 2006).
    Hill’s conviction was not untimely.
    *******
    The judgment is affirmed.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-3756

Filed Date: 12/23/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/23/2020