United States v. Antwan Baker, Sr. ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                  United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 20-2437
    ___________________________
    United States of America
    lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    Antwan Deshon Baker, Sr.
    lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the District of North Dakota - Western
    ____________
    Submitted: December 28, 2020
    Filed: December 31, 2020
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before SHEPHERD, KELLY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Antwan Deshon Baker appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he
    pleaded guilty to a felon-in-possession offense, pursuant to a plea agreement
    1
    The Honorable Daniel M. Traynor, United States District Judge for the District
    of North Dakota.
    containing an appeal waiver. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has
    filed a brief under Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), suggesting that Baker’s
    sentence was substantively unreasonable, and that enforcing the appeal waiver would
    result in a miscarriage of justice. We conclude that the appeal waiver is valid and
    enforceable, and that it applies to the issues counsel raises on appeal. See United
    States v. Scott, 
    627 F.3d 702
    , 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review of validity and
    applicability of appeal waiver); United States v. Andis, 
    333 F.3d 886
    , 890-92 (8th
    Cir. 2003) (en banc) (appeal waiver will be enforced if appeal falls within scope of
    waiver, defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into plea agreement and waiver,
    and enforcing waiver would not result in miscarriage of justice; miscarriage-of-justice
    exception is narrow and generally applies only to ineffective assistance of counsel,
    or sentence that is above statutory range, violates plea agreement, or is based on
    constitutionally impermissible factor).
    Having reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
     (1988),
    we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the appeal waiver.
    Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal, and we grant counsel leave to withdraw.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-2437

Filed Date: 12/31/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/31/2020