United States v. Casey Jackson ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •               United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 20-1443
    ___________________________
    United States of America
    lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    Casey Duante Jackson
    lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield
    ____________
    Submitted: October 22, 2020
    Filed: October 28, 2020
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Casey Jackson appeals the district court’s1 order committing him to the custody
    of the Attorney General for hospitalization and treatment pursuant to 
    18 U.S.C. § 4246
    (authorizing commitment when releasing a person who suffers from a mental disease
    or defect would create a substantial risk of bodily injury or serious damage to
    property).
    We conclude the factual determinations underlying the district court’s
    commitment decision were not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Williams, 
    299 F.3d 673
    , 676-78 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review). The commitment order is
    supported by medical opinions set forth in reports prepared by mental health
    professionals where Jackson is presently confined for treatment, and by defense
    counsel’s independent psychological examiner. See United States v. Ecker, 
    30 F.3d 966
    , 970 (8th Cir. 1994) (listing suggested factors in determining potential
    dangerousness).
    We note that the Attorney General is under a continuing obligation to exert
    reasonable efforts to place Jackson in a suitable state facility, and that his custodians
    must prepare annual reports concerning his mental condition and the need for
    continued commitment. See 
    18 U.S.C. §§ 4246
    (d) and 4247(e)(1)(B).
    The judgment is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the
    Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the
    Honorable David P. Rush, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of
    Missouri.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-1443

Filed Date: 10/28/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/28/2020