David Williams v. Anthony Bradley , 352 F. App'x 133 ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                    United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 08-3554
    ___________
    David Williams,                        *
    *
    Appellant,                 *
    *   Appeal from the United States
    v.                              *   District Court for the Eastern
    *   District of Arkansas.
    Anthony Bradley, Correctional Officer, *
    Jefferson County Jail/Correctional     *   [UNPUBLISHED]
    Facility, ADC; Ronald Bailey, Lt.,     *
    Maximum Security Unit, ADC;            *
    Tommy James, Assistant Warden,         *
    Maximum Security Unit, ADC; Greg       *
    Harmon, Warden, East Arkansas          *
    Regional Unit, ADC; Marvin Evans,      *
    Warden, Tucker Unit, ADC; Ray          *
    Hobbs, Chief Deputy Director, ADC; *
    Max Mobley, Director of                *
    Health/Treatment, ADC; Robert Clark, *
    ADC; James Gibson, Disciplinary        *
    Hearing Administrator, ADC; Keith      *
    Waddle, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, *
    ADC; Larry Norris, Director, ADC;      *
    Sarah Speer, Infirmary Administrator, *
    ADC; Rick Toney, Warden, Varner        *
    Unit, ADC; Tim Moncrief, Warden,       *
    Varner Unit, ADC,                      *
    *
    Appellees.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: November 13, 2009
    Filed: November 18, 2009
    ___________
    Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Inmate David Williams appeals the district court’s1adverse grant of summary
    judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having conducted de novo review of the
    record, we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment in this
    matter. See Mason v. Corr. Med. Servs.,Inc., 
    559 F.3d 880
    , 884-85 (8th Cir. 2009)
    (standard of review); see also Reed v. Lear Corp., 
    556 F.3d 674
    , 678 (8th Cir. 2009)
    (to defeat summary judgment, plaintiff must substantiate allegations with sufficient
    probative evidence permitting finding in his favor). We also find that the district court
    properly limited its consideration to those claims that Williams raised in his third
    amended complaint, which he filed through appointed counsel. See In re Wireless
    Tel. Fed. Cost Recovery Fees Litig., 
    396 F.3d 922
    , 928 (8th Cir. 2005). Accordingly,
    we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Beth Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern
    District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent
    of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-3554

Citation Numbers: 352 F. App'x 133

Judges: Bye, Bowman, Benton

Filed Date: 11/18/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024