Frank Baptist v. Rodney Chandler ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •                  United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 22-1718
    ___________________________
    Frank Baptist
    lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    Rodney Chandler, in his individual capacity
    lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central
    ____________
    Submitted: April 24, 2023
    Filed: April 27, 2023
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before KELLY, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Frank Baptist, a former employee of Arkansas Rehabilitation Services, brought
    this action against his former supervisor, Rodney Chandler. Baptist raised claims
    under 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     and the Arkansas Civil Rights Act. Chandler moved to
    dismiss the complaint based on qualified immunity, the district court1 denied the
    motion, and Chandler filed this interlocutory appeal.
    An interlocutory order denying qualified immunity is immediately appealable.
    See Stanley v. Finnegan, 
    899 F.3d 623
    , 625 (8th Cir. 2018) (interlocutory order
    denying motion to dismiss § 1983 claims against public official based on qualified
    immunity is immediately appealable); see also Langford v. Norris, 
    614 F.3d 445
    , 455
    (8th Cir. 2010) (in civil rights action against state officials, denial of statutory
    immunity under Arkansas law is immediately appealable). Reviewing the district
    court’s qualified immunity determination de novo and viewing the complaint in the
    light most favorable to Baptist, we conclude that the district court properly denied the
    motion to dismiss. See Faulk v. City of St. Louis, 
    30 F.4th 739
    , 744 (8th Cir. 2022)
    (denial of motion to dismiss on qualified immunity grounds is reviewed de novo,
    viewing complaint in light most favorable to plaintiff and accepting all factual
    allegations as true); see also City of Fayetteville v. Romine, 
    284 S.W.3d 10
    , 13 (Ark.
    2008) (discussing qualified immunity afforded state employees under Arkansas law).
    Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern
    District of Arkansas.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-1718

Filed Date: 4/27/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/27/2023