Tommy Phillips v. Kilolo Kijakazi ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                  United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 21-2876
    ___________________________
    Tommy L. Phillips
    lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
    lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
    ____________
    Submitted: April 21, 2022
    Filed: April 26, 2022
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before COLLOTON, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Tommy Phillips appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the decision of the
    Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, which awarded him disability
    1
    The Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig, United States District Judge for the
    Eastern District of Missouri.
    insurance benefits (DIB) and supplemental security income (SSI) based on claims
    filed in 2017, but denied his request to reopen his prior DIB and SSI claims filed in
    2012. Upon careful review, we affirm. See Kraus v. Saul, 
    988 F.3d 1019
    , 1023-24
    (8th Cir. 2021) (de novo review of district court’s judgment; Commissioner’s
    decision will be upheld if it is supported by substantial evidence in record as whole
    and is not based on any legal error).
    We agree that the district court lacked jurisdiction to review the
    Commissioner’s refusal to reopen Phillips’s 2012 claims. See Efinchuk v. Astrue,
    
    480 F.3d 846
    , 848 (8th Cir. 2007) (courts generally lack jurisdiction to review
    Commissioner’s refusal to reopen prior proceeding); 
    20 C.F.R. §§ 404.903
    (l),
    416.1403(a)(5) (denial of request to reopen prior determination is administrative
    action not subject to judicial review). As Phillips has not challenged the merits of the
    Commissioner’s favorable decision on his 2017 DIB and SSI claims, we find that the
    district court properly affirmed that decision. Finally, we find no merit to Phillips’s
    allegation of bias by the district court. See Liteky v. United States, 
    510 U.S. 540
    , 555
    (1994) (judicial rulings alone almost never constitute valid basis for finding of bias).
    The judgment is affirmed.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 21-2876

Filed Date: 4/26/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/26/2022