Charles Winston v. Theaster Petty , 565 F. App'x 577 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 13-3382
    ___________________________
    Charles A. Winston
    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    Theaster Petty, Kitchen Supervisor, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; Lahan
    Ester, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; Greg
    Harmon, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; James Gibon, Disciplinary
    Hearing Administrator, ADC; Larry D. May, Chief Deputy Director, ADC; Ray
    Hobbs, Director, ADC
    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena
    ____________
    Submitted: June 20, 2014
    Filed: June 23, 2014
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Arkansas inmate Charles Winston appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his
    42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Theaster Petty, a kitchen supervisor with the Arkansas
    Department of Correction (ADC), and various other ADC employees. After careful
    review, we conclude that Winston’s retaliatory discipline claim failed as a matter of
    law because Petty’s disciplinary report provides some evidence that Winston actually
    violated prison rules. Cf. Hartsfield v. Nichols, 
    511 F.3d 826
    , 831 (8th Cir. 2008)
    (report from correctional officer, even if disputed by inmate and supported by no other
    evidence, legally suffices as some evidence upon which to base prison disciplinary
    violation, if violation is found by impartial decisionmaker). We also conclude that
    Winston cannot create a genuine issue of material fact as to his hearing officer’s
    impartiality based only on the allegation that Winston had previously filed grievances
    against the hearing officer. See Meuir v. Greene Cnty. Jail Emps., 
    487 F.3d 1115
    ,
    1119 (8th Cir. 2007) (in case of retaliatory discipline, merely alleging that act was
    retaliatory is insufficient).
    We thus affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Winston’s pending motion
    for appointment of counsel.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern
    District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Beth
    Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-3382

Citation Numbers: 565 F. App'x 577

Judges: Gruender, Bowman, Shepherd

Filed Date: 6/23/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024