James Langdeaux v. State of Iowa ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •                 United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 22-2478
    ___________________________
    Trey Redowl; Lawrence Tyndall; Lamonte Bertucci; Robert Strongheart
    lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs
    James William Langdeaux
    lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
    Bryon Bauer; Harold Thomas; Dayton Sabasta; Dustin Nielsen; Zachary Ramirez;
    Jesse Lasley; Marc Hanslip; Torin Ward; Kiedis OldBear; Raymond D. Cooper;
    Damon M. Calaway; Cody Kepple; Lonzo Thomas; Joseph Tapia; John Stead;
    Michael Euchner
    lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs
    v.
    State of Iowa; Judy Morrison, Contractual State Employee; Iowa Department of
    Corrections; Fort Dodge Correctional Facility
    lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
    John Does 1-10; Jane Does 1-10
    lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants
    Robert Johnson; Don Harris; Netti Renshaw
    lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Iowa - Central
    ____________
    Submitted: April 26, 2023
    Filed: May 1, 2023
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before GRUENDER, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    James Langdeaux appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of
    summary judgment in his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     action. During the pendency of this
    appeal, Langdeaux was transferred to another institution, rendering moot his claims
    for declaratory and injunctive relief. See Smith v. Hundley, 
    190 F.3d 852
    , 855 (8th
    Cir. 1999) (inmate’s claims for declaratory and injunctive relief were moot where he
    had been transferred to another prison and was no longer subject to allegedly
    unlawful policies; mere possibility of transfer back to prison at issue was insufficient
    to bring claims within narrow capable-of-repetition-yet-evading-review exception to
    mootness doctrine). As Langdeaux waived his damages claims, we conclude that no
    relief is available, and dismiss the appeal as moot. See Heisler v. Nationwide Mut.
    Ins. Co., 
    931 F.3d 786
    , 797 (8th Cir. 2019) (claims waived on appeal where appellant
    previously waived them or conceded that they failed in summary judgment briefing
    before district court); Robinson v. Pfizer, Inc., 
    855 F.3d 893
    , 897 (8th Cir. 2017)
    (case is moot when it becomes impossible for court to grant any effectual relief).
    1
    The Honorable Leonard T. Strand, Chief Judge, United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Iowa.
    -2-
    The appeal is dismissed.
    ______________________________
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-2478

Filed Date: 5/1/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 5/1/2023