Johnathon Watkins v. Smithfield Packaged Meats Corp. ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •                  United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 23-2649
    ___________________________
    Johnathon Watkins
    lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    Smithfield Packaged Meats Corp.; Beekam; Dusan
    lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the District of South Dakota - Southern
    ____________
    Submitted: August 10, 2023
    Filed: August 24, 2023
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before GRUENDER, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Johnathon Watkins appeals the preservice dismissal of his employment-related
    action against his former employer, Smithfield Packaged Meats Corp. (Smithfield),
    and two co-workers. The district court1 construed Watkins’s complaint as raising
    claims under Title VII. The court dismissed without prejudice the complaint as to
    Smithfield for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and dismissed with
    prejudice the complaint as to the co-workers, reasoning that Title VII does not impose
    liability on individuals.
    We conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing the complaint as
    to Smithfield, as the complaint made no allegations concerning exhaustion of
    administrative remedies. See Miles v. Bellfontaine Habilitation Ctr., 
    481 F.3d 1106
    ,
    1107 (8th Cir. 2007) (per curiam) (noting that a Title VII plaintiff must exhaust
    administrative remedies before bringing suit and that Miles had adequately alleged
    exhaustion by stating she had filed a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity
    Commission and by attaching her right-to-sue letter to her complaint); Brooks v.
    Midwest Heart Grp., 
    655 F.3d 796
    , 801 (8th Cir. 2011) (“[T]he statement in Brooks’s
    complaint that she ‘timely filed charges of Employment Discrimination before the US
    EEOC’ was sufficient to meet the liberal pleading standard of Rule 8(a).”). We
    likewise agree with the district court that dismissal of the individual defendants was
    warranted. See Powell v. Yellow Book USA, Inc., 
    445 F.3d 1074
    , 1079 (8th Cir.
    2006).
    Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District
    of South Dakota.
    -2-