United States v. Adam Chartier ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •                   United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 23-2228
    ___________________________
    United States of America
    Plaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    Adam Robert Chartier
    Defendant - Appellant
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids
    ____________
    Submitted: November 13, 2023
    Filed: December 27, 2023
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before COLLOTON, WOLLMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    In 2013, Adam Robert Chartier pled guilty to possession of pseudoephedrine
    to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. § 841
    (c)(2). The district
    court sentenced him to 113 months in prison and three years of supervised release.
    In 2020, he violated his first term of release. The district court sentenced him to 24
    months in prison and one year of supervised release. In 2023, he violated his second
    term of release. The district court 1 sentenced him to 18 months in prison. He appeals
    his sentence. Having jurisdiction under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    , this court affirms.
    Chartier asserts his above-guidelines revocation sentence of 18 months
    (guidelines range 8 to 14 months) is substantively unreasonable. This court reviews
    for abuse of discretion. United States v. Beran, 
    751 F.3d 872
    , 875 (8th Cir. 2014).
    “[I]t will be the unusual case when we reverse a district court sentence—whether
    within, above, or below the applicable Guidelines range—as substantively
    unreasonable.” United States v. Feemster, 
    572 F.3d 455
    , 464 (8th Cir. 2009) (en
    banc).
    The district court properly considered the 
    18 U.S.C. § 3553
    (a) factors,
    including Chartier’s repeated violations of his conditions of supervision and his
    criminal history (two federal drug convictions, burglary, assault, and operating a
    vehicle while intoxicated). Chartier believes the court failed to consider his
    substance abuse issues. But the court specifically discussed them, noting he “had all
    kinds of opportunities for drug treatment and has continued to use.” See United
    States v. Merrival, 
    521 F.3d 889
    , 890-91 (8th Cir. 2008) (affirming an above-
    guidelines revocation sentence where drug rehabilitation was ineffective). He also
    argues the court improperly faulted him for contesting certain violations. This is
    inaccurate. Rather, the court considered his lies in contesting the violations. This is
    not improper. See United States v. Crane, 
    2022 WL 13705211
    , at *2 (8th Cir. Oct.
    24, 2022) (unpublished) (affirming an above-guidelines revocation sentence and
    noting the court was “permitted to consider” defendant’s perjury). The court did not
    abuse its discretion. See United States v. Growden, 
    663 F.3d 982
    , 984-85 (8th Cir.
    2011) (affirming an above-guidelines sentence based on repeated violations on
    release and refusal to take responsibility for crimes).
    1
    The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Court Judge for the
    Northern District of Iowa.
    -2-
    *******
    The judgment is affirmed.
    ______________________________
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 23-2228

Filed Date: 12/27/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/27/2023