Stephen Griffin v. Lance Beaty ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                       United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 05-3689
    ___________
    Lance A. Beaty; Stephen B. Nelson;       *
    Great Western Resources, LLC;            *
    Mid-West Truck Equipment, Inc.,          *
    *
    Appellees,                   *
    *
    v.                                 *   Appeal from the United States
    *   District Court for the
    Stephen A. Griffin,                      *   Western District of Arkansas.
    *
    Appellant,                   *   [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Family Shops, Inc.; Budget Tire &        *
    Supply Company, Inc.; Petroleum          *
    Equipment Co. Of Arkansas, Inc.; G &     *
    K Oil Company; NWA Family Shops,         *
    formerly known as Griffin-Mardis         *
    Investments Inc., formerly known as      *
    Flash Market Inc., Inc.; Bank of         *
    Arkansas, N.A.; First National Bank of   *
    Fort Smith; Arvest Bank; Community       *
    Bank of Northwest Arkansas;              *
    Farmers Bank of Greenwood;               *
    Tommy Mardis; John A. Griffin; G & S     *
    Oil Company; Steven Riggs; Highway       *
    71 South Liquors; Empire Liquor, Inc.,   *
    *
    Defendants.                  *
    ___________
    Submitted: October 31, 2006
    Filed: November 8, 2006
    ___________
    Before RILEY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Stephen Griffin’s attorneys, David Nixon and Theresa Pockrus (“Griffin’s
    Counsel”), appeal from the district court’s1 order affirming the bankruptcy court’s2
    imposition of $1,100 in sanctions against them under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy
    Procedure 9011.3 The bankruptcy court imposed the sanctions because Griffin’s
    Counsel had filed, in Griffin’s name, counterclaims for which standing to sue rested
    solely with the bankruptcy estate’s trustee.
    We review the bankruptcy court’s imposition of sanctions for an abuse of
    discretion. In re Coones Ranch, Inc., 
    7 F.3d 740
    , 743 (8th Cir. 1993). The bankruptcy
    estate included Griffin’s counterclaims. 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1); Whetzal v. Alderson,
    
    32 F.3d 1302
    , 1303 (8th Cir.1994). The bankruptcy trustee had the capacity to sue
    and be sued with respect to the estate’s property. 11 U.S.C. § 323. Griffin’s Counsel
    failed to establish any exception to the general rule that “a debtor may not prosecute
    1
    The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western
    District of Arkansas.
    2
    The Honorable James G. Mixon, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the
    Western District of Arkansas.
    3
    Although record documents refer to Griffin as the appellant, Griffin’s Counsel
    are the real parties in interest in this appeal.
    -2-
    on his own a cause of action belonging to the estate unless that cause of action has
    been abandoned by the trustee.” Vreugdenhil v. Hoekstra, 
    773 F.2d 213
    , 215 (8th Cir.
    1985); cf. Wissman v. Pittsburgh Nat’l Bank, 
    942 F.2d 867
    , 869-71 (4th Cir. 1991)
    (where cause of action was exempt under bankruptcy laws and therefore not property
    of bankruptcy estate, debtor had standing to bring cause of action in own name
    without trustee’s formal abandonment of claim). We conclude that the bankruptcy
    court’s imposition of sanctions was not an abuse of discretion. See Cooter & Gell v.
    Hartmarx Corp., 
    496 U.S. 384
    , 404 (1990) (trial court is best situated to determine
    when sanctions are warranted; deference to determination of courts on front lines of
    litigation enhances courts’ ability to control litigants).
    Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    ______________________________
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-3689

Judges: Riley, Colloton, Gruender

Filed Date: 11/8/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/2/2024