United States v. Keith Clevenger ( 2024 )


Menu:
  •                   United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 24-2311
    ___________________________
    United States of America
    Plaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    Keith A. Clevenger
    Defendant - Appellant
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
    ____________
    Submitted: November 5, 2024
    Filed: November 8, 2024
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before BENTON, SHEPHERD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Keith Clevenger appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pled
    guilty to conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance pursuant to a plea agreement
    1
    The Honorable Beth Phillips, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
    the Western District of Missouri.
    containing an appeal waiver. Having jurisdiction under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    , this court
    dismisses the appeal based on the appeal waiver.
    Counsel moved for leave to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v.
    California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), acknowledging the appeal waiver but challenging
    the sentence as substantively unreasonable. Upon careful review, this court
    concludes that the appeal waiver is enforceable, the issue identified by counsel falls
    within the scope of the appeal waiver, the record shows that Clevenger entered into
    the plea agreement and the appeal waiver knowingly and voluntarily, and no
    miscarriage of justice would result from enforcing the waiver. See United States v.
    Scott, 
    627 F.3d 702
    , 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review); United States v. Andis,
    
    333 F.3d 886
    , 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (appeal waiver will be enforced if
    appeal falls within scope of waiver, defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered
    into plea agreement and waiver, and enforcing waiver would not result in
    miscarriage of justice).
    Having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
     (1988), this court finds no non-frivolous issues outside the scope of the
    appeal waiver.
    The appeal is dismissed and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 24-2311

Filed Date: 11/8/2024

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/8/2024