United States v. Chester Davis , 598 F. App'x 541 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                               FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                                MAR 18 2015
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                         U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                         No. 13-30188
    Plaintiff - Appellee,              D.C. No. 3:12-cr-00109-SI-1
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    CHESTER EVANS DAVIS,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Oregon
    Michael H. Simon, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted March 10, 2015**
    Before:        FARRIS, WARDLAW, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    Chester Evans Davis appeals his jury-trial conviction and 97-month
    sentence for evasion of payment of taxes and evasion of tax assessments, in
    violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201; failure to file corporate tax returns, in violation of
    26 U.S.C. § 7203; and obstructing the due administration of the internal revenue
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    laws, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7212(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), appointed counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no
    grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have
    provided Davis the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se
    supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
    Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    , 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. The
    district court did not clearly err in finding that Davis was competent to stand trial.
    See United States v. Gastelum-Almeida, 
    298 F.3d 1167
    , 1171 (9th Cir. 2002).
    Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                     13-30188
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-30188

Citation Numbers: 598 F. App'x 541

Judges: Farris, Wardlaw, Paez

Filed Date: 3/18/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024