Yumin Xuan v. Merrick Garland ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                               NOT FOR PUBLICATION                        FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        FEB 24 2022
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    YUMIN XUAN,                                     No.    19-71731
    Petitioner,                     Agency No. A096-494-474
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney
    General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Submitted February 15, 2022**
    Before:      FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
    Yumin Xuan, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board
    of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen removal
    proceedings to apply for adjustment of status. Our jurisdiction is governed by
    
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    . We dismiss the petition for review.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s determination not to reopen
    removal proceedings where Xuan does not raise a colorable legal or constitutional
    error underlying the BIA’s decision that would invoke our jurisdiction. See Lona
    v. Barr, 
    958 F.3d 1225
    , 1227 (9th Cir. 2020) (the court retains jurisdiction to
    review BIA decisions denying sua sponte reopening for the limited purpose of
    reviewing the reasoning behind the decision for legal or constitutional error). We
    lack jurisdiction to consider Xuan’s contentions as to equitable estoppel that she
    raises for the first time in her opening brief because she did not raise them to the
    BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 
    358 F.3d 674
    , 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks
    jurisdiction to review claims not presented to the agency). To the extent Xuan now
    contends her motion to reopen qualifies for an exception to the statutory
    requirement of timely filing, we lack jurisdiction to consider this unexhausted
    issue. See 
    id.
    The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the
    mandate.
    PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
    2                                    19-71731
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-71731

Filed Date: 2/24/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 2/24/2022