Gerencser v. Commissioner ( 2017 )

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 30 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ERIC STEPHEN GERENCSER, No. 17-70134
Petitioner-Appellant, Tax Ct. No. 8381-14
v.
MEMORANDUM*
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from a Decision of the
United States Tax Court
Submitted October 23, 2017**
Before: LEAVY, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Eric Stephen Gerencser appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s decision,
following a bench trial, upholding the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s
determination of deficiencies and penalties for the tax years 2010 and 2011. We
have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1). We review de novo conclusions of
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
law and for clear error questions of fact. Hardy v. Comm’r, 181 F.3d 1002, 1004
(9th Cir. 1999). We affirm.
The Tax Court properly determined that Gerencser was not entitled to the
foreign tax credit for tax years 2010 and 2011 because Gerencser had not paid any
foreign taxes, and he failed to establish that he had accrued any foreign tax
liability. See 26 U.S.C. §§ 901, 905 (explaining the foreign tax credit). Contrary
to Gerencser’s contention, the Tax Court did not err in failing to shift the burden of
proof to the Commissioner because Gerencser failed to provide credible evidence.
See id. § 7491(a) (requirements for shifting burden of proof to Commissioner); see
also Hardy, 181 F.3d at 1004-05 (describing the general burden of proof in
deficiency cases).
The Tax Court properly determined that Gerencser was liable for accuracy-
related penalties because Gerencser was negligent in claiming both the foreign tax
credit and the foreign earned income exclusion, and he failed to establish
reasonable cause and good faith. See 26 U.S.C. §§ 6662 (accuracy-related penalty
imposed when underpayment is substantial or due to taxpayer’s negligence); 26
U.S.C. § 6664(c)(1) (penalty should not be imposed for underpayment where
reasonable cause and good faith are demonstrated); see also Sparkman v. Comm’r,
509 F.3d 1149, 1161 (9th Cir. 2007) (defining negligence as any failure to make a
reasonable attempt to comply with the Internal Revenue Code).
2 17-70134
We reject as without merit Gerencser’s contentions regarding his NATO
wages, the preclusive effect of his tax case from tax year 2009, the applicability of
the tax treaty between the United States and Germany, and whether he received
due process.
We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued
in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on
appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).
AFFIRMED.
3 17-70134