James Acres v. Blue Lake Rancheria , 692 F. App'x 894 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        JUN 30 2017
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    JAMES RAYMOND ACRES,                            No. 17-15502
    Plaintiff-Appellant,            D.C. No. 3:16-cv-05391-WHO
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    BLUE LAKE RANCHERIA; et al.,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of California
    William Horsley Orrick, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted June 26, 2017**
    Before:      PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
    James Raymond Acres appeals pro se from the district court’s order
    dismissing his action for failure to exhaust tribal court remedies. We have
    jurisdiction under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    . We review de novo. Slep-Tone Entm’t Corp.
    v. Wired for Sound Karaoke & DJ Servs., LLC, 
    845 F.3d 1246
    , 1248 (9th Cir.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    2017) (motion to dismiss); Boozer v. Wilder, 
    381 F.3d 931
    , 934 (9th Cir. 2004)
    (exhaustion of tribal court remedies). We affirm.
    The district court properly dismissed Acres’s action because Acres did not
    exhaust tribal court remedies and failed to demonstrate that exhaustion was
    excused. See Grand Canyon Skywalk Dev., LLC v. ‘Sa’ Nyu Wa Inc., 
    715 F.3d 1196
    , 1200-01 (9th Cir. 2013) (a federal court may not make a ruling on tribal
    court jurisdiction until tribal court remedies are exhausted and “a tribal court . . .
    must have acted in bad faith for exhaustion to be excused”).
    We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on
    appeal or in the reply brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 
    587 F.3d 983
    , 985 n.2 (9th Cir.
    2009).
    Acres’s motion to take judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 21) is denied.
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                     17-15502
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-15502

Citation Numbers: 692 F. App'x 894

Judges: Paez, Bea, Murguia

Filed Date: 6/30/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024