-
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 01 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL LAWRENCE SMITH, No. 10-17141 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:07-cv-00837-WBS- CMK v. FIGEROE; et al., MEMORANDUM * Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 25, 2011 ** Before: TROTT, GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges. Daniel Lawrence Smith, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his
42 U.S.C. § 1983action alleging that defendants violated his right of access to the courts. We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Jones v. Blanas,
393 F.3d 918, 926 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm. The district court properly granted summary judgment because Smith failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether he suffered an actual injury as a result of the loss of the Keybo declaration. See Lewis v. Casey,
518 U.S. 343, 350-53 (1996) (access-to-courts claim requires plaintiff to show that defendants’ conduct caused actual injury to a non-frivolous legal claim). Specifically, Smith did not raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the declaration contained “newly discovered evidence” that would allow him to pursue a state habeas action. In re Hardy,
163 P.3d 853, 872 (Cal. 2007) (setting forth the requirements for pursuing a habeas action claiming actual innocence based on newly discovered evidence). We do not consider issues that were not raised in the opening brief. See Smith v. Marsh,
194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999). Smith’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive. AFFIRMED. 2 10-17141
Document Info
Docket Number: 10-17141
Judges: Trott, Gould, Rawlinson
Filed Date: 11/1/2011
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024