United States v. Cruz Lafarga ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                          FILED
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT                           APR 10 2015
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 14-10322
    Plaintiff - Appellee,              D.C. No. 2:13-cr-00085-JAD
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    CRUZ ALBERT LAFARGA, AKA Albert
    Lafarga-Cruz,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Nevada
    Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted April 7, 2015 **
    Before:       FISHER, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
    Cruz Albert Lafarga appeals from the district court’s judgment and
    challenges the 126-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction
    for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, possession with intent to distribute
    methamphetamine, and distribution of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and 846; and being an illegal alien in possession of a
    firearm in violation of 
    18 U.S.C. §§ 922
    (g)(5)(A) and 924(a)(2). We have
    jurisdiction under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    , and we affirm.
    Lafarga asserts that the district court’s sentence of 126 months is
    substantively unreasonable in light of his strong family support and lack of
    criminal history. To determine whether a sentence is substantively unreasonable,
    we consider the 
    18 U.S.C. § 3553
    (a) factors and the totality of the circumstances.
    See Gall v. United States, 
    552 U.S. 38
    , 51 (2007). We review for abuse of
    discretion and “will provide relief only in rare cases.” United States v. Ressam,
    
    679 F.3d 1069
    , 1086, 1088 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc).
    This is not the rare case where relief is appropriate. The district court fully
    considered the mitigating factors urged by Lafarga in determining the appropriate
    sentence. Indeed, the district court granted Lafarga a 25-month downward
    variance based on those circumstances. The below-Guidelines sentence is
    substantively reasonable in light of the section 3553(a) sentencing factors and the
    totality of the circumstances. See Gall, 
    552 U.S. at 51
    .
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                     14-10322
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-10322

Judges: Fisher, Tallman, Nguyen

Filed Date: 4/10/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024