United States v. Guadalupe Castillo-Alvarado , 633 F. App'x 467 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                                                             FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                                 MAR 21 2016
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 15-10292
    Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 2:15-cr-00122-JJT
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    GUADALUPE ANTONIO CASTILLO-
    ALVARADO,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Arizona
    John J. Tuchi, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted March 15, 2016**
    Before:        GOODWIN, LEAVY, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
    Guadalupe Antonio Castillo-Alvarado appeals from the district court’s
    judgment and challenges the sentence of 13 months and one day imposed
    following his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    marijuana and aiding and abetting, in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. § 841
    (a)(1), (b)(1)(D)
    and 
    18 U.S.C. § 2
    . Pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967),
    Castillo-Alvarado’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for
    relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided
    Castillo-Alvarado the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se
    supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
    Castillo-Alvarado waived his right to appeal his sentence. Our independent
    review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    , 80 (1988), discloses
    no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 
    582 F.3d 974
    , 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. See 
    id. at 988
    .
    Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
    DISMISSED.
    2                                    15-10292
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-10292

Citation Numbers: 633 F. App'x 467

Judges: Goodwin, Leavy, Christen

Filed Date: 3/21/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024