Contreras v. Holder , 382 F. App'x 653 ( 2010 )

FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 09 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FELIX CONTRERAS; et al., No. 08-70155
Petitioners, Agency Nos. A095-193-782
A095-193-783
v. A095-193-784
A095-193-785
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent. MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 25, 2010 **
Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Felix Contreras, Maria Contreras, and their two children, natives and citizens
of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’
(“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to
reopen, Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002), and we deny the
petition for review.
The BIA acted within its broad discretion in determining that the evidence
presented with the motion to reopen was insufficient to warrant reopening. See id.(BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed only if it is “arbitrary,
irrational, or contrary to law”).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 08-70155