Gelacio Panzo v. Loretta E. Lynch , 624 F. App'x 569 ( 2015 )

FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 15 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GELACIO DELORES PANZO, AKA No. 14-71976
Gelasio Dolores Panzo, AKA Geracio
Panzo, Agency No. A095-758-802
Petitioner,
MEMORANDUM*
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 9, 2015**
Before: WALLACE, RAWLINSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Gelacio Delores Panzo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
immigration judge’s decision denying his request for voluntary departure. We
dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary denial of Panzo’s
application for voluntary departure where Panzo presents no question of law that
would invoke our jurisdiction. See Gil v. Holder, 651 F.3d 1000, 1003 (9th Cir.
2011) (overruled on other grounds by Moncrieffe v. Holder, 133 S. Ct. 1678
(2013)) (this court has no jurisdiction to review discretionary denials of voluntary
departure, but retains jurisdiction to review questions of law or constitutional
challenges to denials of such relief); see also Corro-Barragan v. Holder, 718 F.3d
1174, 1176-77 (9th Cir. 2013) (same).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
2 14-71976