Gomez Vivanco v. Holder , 381 F. App'x 679 ( 2010 )

FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 02 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROGELIO GOMEZ VIVANCO, No. 08-70160
Petitioner, Agency No. A075-528-262
v.
MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 25, 2010 **
Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Rogelio Gomez Vivanco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision finding him ineligible for cancellation of removal.
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law,
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 1105, 1107 (9th Cir. 2003), and we deny the
petition for review.
The agency properly concluded that Gomez Vivanco was ineligible for
cancellation of removal because his conviction under Cal. Penal Code § 12025(a)
constitutes a firearms offense for the purposes of 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(C). See
8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(1)(C); Valerio-Ochoa v. INS, 241 F.3d 1092, 1095 (9th Cir.
2001). The expungement of the conviction pursuant to Cal. Penal Code § 1203.4
did not eliminate the immigration consequences of the conviction. See
Ramirez-Castro v. INS, 287 F.3d 1172, 1174-76 (9th Cir. 2002).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 08-70160