United States v. Edgardo Solorio-Camacho , 531 F. App'x 780 ( 2013 )

FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 21 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-10184
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:11-cr-00118-MCE
v.
MEMORANDUM *
EDGARDO SOLORIO-CAMACHO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Morrison C. England, Jr., Chief Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 18, 2013 **
Before: TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Edgardo Solorio-Camacho appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 168-month sentence for possession with
intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Solorio-Camacho’s counsel
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to
withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Solorio-Camacho the
opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or
answering brief has been filed.
Solorio-Camacho has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80
(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United
States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss
the appeal. See id. at 988.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Solorio-Camacho’s motion
for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED.
DISMISSED.
2 12-10184