James Dovenberg v. United States , 407 F. App'x 149 ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                             NOT FOR PUBLICATION
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                         FILED
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT                           DEC 22 2010
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    JAMES DOVENBERG,                                 No. 10-35007
    Plaintiff - Appellant,             D.C. No. 3:08-cv-00889-MO
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and
    through the United States Forest Service;
    UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE;
    STATE OF OREGON, by and through the
    Oregon Department of Forestry; OREGON
    DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Oregon
    Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding
    Argued and Submitted December 7, 2010
    Seattle, Washington
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    Before: O’SCANNLAIN and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges, and EZRA, District
    Judge.**
    James Dovenberg appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his suit
    against the United States and the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”)
    for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
    12(b)(1). As the facts are known to the parties, we repeat them here only as
    necessary to explain our decision.
    Dovenberg’s complaint challenges broadly the government’s allegedly
    negligent training, supervision, and instruction of Forest Service personnel
    working on Dovenberg’s land while fighting and remediating damage from the
    14,000-acre Shake Table Complex wildfire in 2006. Decisions regarding the
    training and supervision of government employees “fall squarely within the
    discretionary function exception” to the Federal Tort Claims Act, Nurse v. United
    States, 
    226 F.3d 996
    , 1001 (9th Cir. 2000), as does the Forest Service’s choice of
    how to fight a wildfire, see Miller v. United States, 
    163 F.3d 591
    , 595–96 (9th Cir.
    1998). Dovenberg’s claims against the government are therefore barred. See 
    28 U.S.C. § 2680
    (a).
    The district court’s grant of the government’s motion to dismiss is
    AFFIRMED.
    **
    The Honorable David A. Ezra, United States District Judge for the
    District of Hawaii, sitting by designation.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-35007

Citation Numbers: 407 F. App'x 149

Judges: O'Scannlain, Tallman, Ezra

Filed Date: 12/22/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024