Rafael Torres-Otamendi v. Eric H. Holder Jr. , 407 F. App'x 117 ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            DEC 22 2010
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    RAFAEL TORRES-OTAMENDI,                          No. 08-72141
    Petitioner,                        Agency No. A098-766-073
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Submitted December 14, 2010 **
    Before:       GOODWIN, WALLACE and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
    Petitioner Rafael Torres-Otamendi, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions
    for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing his appeal from an
    immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of
    removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have
    jurisdiction under 
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    . We deny the petition for review.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s denial of asylum and withholding of
    removal because, even though he credibly testified, Torres-Otamendi failed to
    show any threats to him on account of a protected ground. His fear of future
    persecution based on an actual or imputed anti-gang or anti-crime opinion is not on
    account of the protected ground of either membership in a particular social group
    or political opinion. Ramos Barrios v. Holder, 
    581 F.3d 849
    , 854-56 (9th Cir.
    2009); Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey, 
    542 F.3d 748
    , 745-46 (9th Cir. 2008); see
    Ochave v. INS, 
    254 F.3d 859
    , 865 (9th Cir. 2001) (“Asylum generally is not
    available to victims of civil strife, unless they are singled out on account of a
    protected ground.”)
    Substantial evidence also supports the IJ’s denial of CAT relief based on the
    Board’s finding that Torres-Otamendi did not establish a likelihood of torture by,
    at the instigation of, or with the consent or acquiescence of the Mexican
    government. See Arteaga v. Mukasey, 
    511 F.3d 940
    , 948-49 (9th Cir. 2007).
    PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
    2                                        08-72141
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-72141

Citation Numbers: 407 F. App'x 117

Judges: Goodwin, Wallace, Thomas

Filed Date: 12/22/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024