Melvin Munir v. Thomas , 471 F. App'x 570 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            MAR 06 2012
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    MELVIN MUNIR,                                     No. 09-15727
    Plaintiff - Appellee,              D.C. No. 2:05-cv-01996-MCE-
    EFB
    v.
    THOMAS, Sergeant,                                 MEMORANDUM *
    Defendant - Appellant,
    and
    MARTINEZ, Correctional Officer; et al.,
    Defendants.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of California
    Morrison C. England, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted February 21, 2012 **
    Before:        FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
    Thomas, a housing sergeant at California Medical Facility, appeals from the
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    district court’s order denying him qualified immunity in plaintiff’ Munir’s 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     action alleging deliberate indifference to serious medical needs. We
    dismiss for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
    We lack jurisdiction to consider this interlocutory appeal because “an order
    denying qualified immunity on the ground that a genuine issue of material fact
    exists is not a final, immediately appealable order.” Maropulos v. County of Los
    Angeles, 
    560 F.3d 974
    , 975 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam), citing Johnson v. Jones,
    
    515 U.S. 304
    , 314-15 (1995). The district court denied qualified immunity to
    Thomas after determining that there were genuine disputes of material fact as to
    whether Thomas was deliberately indifferent to Munir’s medical needs, and that
    those facts, if proven, would establish a violation of Munir’s clearly established
    Eighth Amendment rights. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of
    jurisdiction.
    DISMISSED.
    2                                09-15727
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-15727

Citation Numbers: 471 F. App'x 570

Judges: Fernandez, McKeown, Bybee

Filed Date: 3/6/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024