United States v. Ignacio Herrera ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                                                             FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                              JUL 03 2012
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                         No. 11-50131
    Plaintiff - Appellee,              D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00265-PSG
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    IGNACIO HERRERA,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Central District of California
    Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted June 26, 2012 **
    Before:        SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
    Ignacio Herrera appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed following his
    guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine, and to possess with
    intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. §§ 841
    (a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    846. We have jurisdiction under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    , and we affirm.
    Herrera contends that the district court procedurally erred by denying him a
    four-level departure under U.S.S.G. § 5H1.2 on the basis of his medical condition.
    Herrera never requested this particular departure in the district court. In any event,
    our review of a decision not to depart considers only whether the resulting sentence
    was substantively reasonable. See United States v. Ellis, 
    641 F.3d 411
    , 421-22 (9th
    Cir. 2011). Herrera’s sentence 15 months below the bottom of the advisory
    Sentencing Guidelines range is substantively reasonable in light of the totality of
    the circumstances and the factors set forth in 
    18 U.S.C. § 3553
    (a), including the
    seriousness of the offense and the need to avoid unwarranted sentencing
    disparities. See Gall v. United States, 
    552 U.S. 38
    , 51 (2007).
    To the extent that Herrera argues that the district court failed to consider
    particular factors relevant to his medical condition in selecting a sentence, the
    record belies this contention.
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                    11-50131
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-50131

Judges: Schroeder, Hawkins, Gould

Filed Date: 7/3/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024