Taylor v. Commissioner , 422 F. App'x 620 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             MAR 18 2011
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    JEFFREY R. TAYLOR,                               No. 09-71253
    Petitioner - Appellant,           Tax Ct. No. 3226-06
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
    REVENUE,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from a Decision of the
    United States Tax Court
    Submitted March 8, 2011 **
    Before:        FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
    Jeffrey R. Taylor appeals pro se from the tax court’s decision upholding the
    Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s denial of his request for innocent spouse
    relief for tax years 1986 and 1987. We have jurisdiction under 
    26 U.S.C. § 7482
    (a)(1). We review for clear error the tax court’s determination that a
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    taxpayer is not entitled to innocent spouse relief. Guth v. Comm’r, 
    897 F.2d 441
    ,
    443 (9th Cir. 1990). We affirm.
    The Tax Court did not clearly err in denying Taylor innocent spouse relief
    because the evidence in the record, including Taylor’s guilty plea to tax evasion for
    1987 and the stipulated decision imposing fraud penalties for 1986 and 1987,
    supported its conclusion that Taylor had actual knowledge of the items giving rise
    to the tax deficiencies when he prepared and signed the relevant joint federal
    income tax returns. See 
    26 U.S.C. §§ 6015
    (b)(1)(C), (c)(3)(C) (no entitlement to
    innocent spouse relief where taxpayer knew or had reason to know of
    understatement, or had actual knowledge of items giving rise to deficiencies). In
    light of these circumstances, the Commissioner’s discretionary decision to deny
    equitable relief was also reasonable. See 
    26 U.S.C. § 6015
    (f) (providing for
    innocent spouse relief where equitable).
    Taylor’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
    Taylor’s motion to supplement his reply brief is granted.
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                     09-71253
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-71253

Citation Numbers: 422 F. App'x 620

Judges: Farris, O'Scannlain, Bybee

Filed Date: 3/18/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024