United States v. Darcy Paschall , 692 F. App'x 937 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                             NOT FOR PUBLICATION                          FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       JUL 3 2017
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                       No.    16-50502
    Plaintiff-Appellee,            D.C. No. 3:05-cr-00200-BEN
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    DARCY PASCHALL,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of California
    Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted June 26, 2017**
    Before:      PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
    Darcy Paschall appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the
    six-month custodial sentence and 51-month term of supervision imposed upon
    revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    ,
    and we affirm.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    Paschall contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to
    respond to her nonfrivolous argument in favor of leniency. We review for plain
    error, see United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 
    608 F.3d 1103
    , 1108 (9th Cir.
    2010), and conclude that there was none. The record reflects that the district court
    considered Paschall’s argument and adequately explained its reasons for imposing
    the sentence selected. See Rita v. United States, 
    551 U.S. 338
    , 358-59 (2007).
    Paschall also contends that the 51-month term of supervised release is
    substantively unreasonable in light of the district court’s willingness to terminate
    supervision in two years if Paschall remains violation-free. The district court did
    not abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United States, 
    552 U.S. 38
    , 51 (2007). The
    term of supervised release is substantively reasonable in light of the 
    18 U.S.C. § 3583
    (e) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including
    Paschall’s history of drug and alcohol abuse. See Gall, 
    552 U.S. at 51
    .
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                     16-50502
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-50502

Citation Numbers: 692 F. App'x 937

Judges: Paez, Bea, Murguia

Filed Date: 7/3/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024