United States v. Humberto Gostelos-Fuentes , 617 F. App'x 711 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                               FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                                 JUN 19 2015
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                          U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 14-10332
    Plaintiff - Appellee,              D.C. No. 3:13-cr-00076-RCJ-
    VPC-1
    v.
    HUMBERTO GOSTELOS-FUENTES,                       MEMORANDUM*
    a.k.a. Roberto Flores-Millan,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 14-10333
    Plaintiff - Appellee,              D.C. No. 3:13-cr-00078-RCJ-
    WGC-1
    v.
    HUMBERTO GOSTELOS-FUENTES,
    a.k.a. Beto, a.k.a. Roberto Flores-Millan,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Nevada
    Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    Submitted March 17, 2015**
    Before:        HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
    Humberto Gostelos-Fuentes appeals from the district court’s judgments and
    challenges his guilty-plea convictions and concurrent 135-month sentences for
    unlawful reentry by a deported, removed, or excluded alien, in violation of 8
    U.S.C. § 1326, and conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute
    methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(viii) and 846.
    Pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), Gostelo-Fuentes’s counsel
    has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to
    withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Gostelo-Fuentes the
    opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or
    answering brief has been filed.
    Gostelo-Fuentes has waived his right to appeal his convictions and his 135-
    month sentences. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity
    of the appeal waivers, we dismiss the appeals. See United States v. Watson, 
    582 F.3d 974
    , 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).
    Counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel is GRANTED.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    2
    DISMISSED.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-10332, 14-10333

Citation Numbers: 617 F. App'x 711

Judges: Hug, Farris, Canby

Filed Date: 6/19/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024