Kirsten Cook v. Kenneth Cook ( 2018 )

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 14 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KIRSTEN COOK and ESTATE OF No. 17-55543
ETHAN COOK,
D.C. No. 8:15-cv-01448-CJC-JCG
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v. MEMORANDUM*
KENNETH ALAN COOK; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for Central California, Santa Ana
Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 12, 2018
Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and HAWKINS and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s order entered
December 6, 2016 (Dkt. 167), and its order entered February 8, 2017 (Dkt. 182).
Under the circumstances, the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P . 34(a)(2)
to retain supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims. See Brown v. Lucky
Stores, Inc., 246 F.3d 1182, 1187 (9th Cir. 2001) (stating standard).1
AFFIRMED.
1
Appellant’s motion for an extension of time in which to file a reply brief (Dkt.
No. 78) is DENIED.
2