Mahmood Yoonessi v. Andre Khansari ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                         JUL 18 2017
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    MAHMOOD YOONESSI,                                No. 16-56374
    Plaintiff-Appellant,             D.C. No. 2:15-cv-09329-SVW-
    AJW
    v.
    ANDRE KHANSARI, LACBA; et al.,                   MEMORANDUM*
    Defendants-Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Central District of California
    Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted July 11, 2017**
    Before:      CANBY, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
    Mahmood Yoonessi appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
    dismissing for failure to prosecute his action alleging federal and state law claims.
    We have jurisdiction under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    . We review for an abuse of
    discretion a dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992). We affirm.
    The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Yoonesi’s action
    with prejudice after weighing the pertinent factors and evaluating alternatives to
    dismissal. See 
    id. at 1260-63
     (setting forth factors for determining whether a pro
    se action should be dismissed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)).
    We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on
    appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 
    587 F.3d 983
    , 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).
    Defendant Prudential Mortgage Capital Company, Now Known As PGIM
    Real Estate Finance, LLC.’s pending motion (Docket Entry No. 7) is granted.
    Defendants Citibank TIAA and David Howerton’s pending motion (Docket
    Entry No. 17) is granted.
    Yoonesi’s motion for leave to file a late reply brief (Docket Entry No. 39) is
    granted. The Clerk shall file the reply brief submitted at Docket Entry No. 41.
    Yoonesi’s remaining pending motions (Docket Entry Nos. 6, 40, and 42) are
    denied.
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                   16-56374
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-56374

Filed Date: 7/18/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021