United States v. Santos Diaz-Martinez , 695 F. App'x 267 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                                                             FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                              AUG 14 2017
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 16-50447
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    D.C. No. 3:16-cr-01035-BEN
    v.
    SANTOS DIAZ-MARTINEZ,                            MEMORANDUM*
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of California
    Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted August 9, 2017**
    Before:        SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    Santos Diaz-Martinez appeals from the district court’s judgment and
    challenges the 57-month sentence and $250 fine imposed following his guilty-plea
    conviction for attempted reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
    § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    Diaz-Martinez contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. The
    district court did not abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United States, 
    552 U.S. 38
    ,
    51 (2007). The 57-month sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18
    U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including
    Diaz-Martinez’s criminal history and his prior 48-month sentence for the same
    offense. See 
    Gall, 552 U.S. at 51
    . The below-Guidelines fine is also substantively
    reasonable in light of Diaz-Martinez’s work history. See United States v. Orlando,
    
    553 F.3d 1235
    , 1239-40 (9th Cir. 2009).
    To the extent that Diaz-Martinez argues that the court selected the sentence
    based on “hostility and a lack of objectivity,” the record does not support his claim.
    Rather, the record reflects that the court relied on proper sentencing factors,
    including the need for deterrence and protection of the public. See 18 U.S.C.
    § 3553(a); 
    Gall, 552 U.S. at 51
    .
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                      16-50447
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-50447

Citation Numbers: 695 F. App'x 267

Judges: Schroeder, Tashima, Smith

Filed Date: 8/14/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024