United States v. Brenda Jaime-Sainz , 695 F. App'x 263 ( 2017 )

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 14 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-30248
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:16-cr-00114-BLW
v.
MEMORANDUM*
BRENDA TRINIDAD JAIME-SAINZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Idaho
B. Lynn Winmill, Chief Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 9, 2017**
Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Brenda Trinidad Jaime-Sainz appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 210-month concurrent sentences imposed following her guilty-plea
convictions for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, distribution of
methamphetamine, and possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute,
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. We have jurisdiction under 28
U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Jaime-Sainz contends that the district court abdicated its responsibility to
conduct an independent inquiry as to the extent of the downward departure she
should receive for her substantial assistance to the government under U.S.S.G.
§ 5K1.1. To the contrary, the record reflects that the district court considered
arguments from both parties and provided a reasoned basis for its acceptance of the
government’s two-level downward departure recommendation. See United States
v. Laney, 189 F.3d 954, 964 (9th Cir. 1999). The court did not err by giving
weight to the government’s assessment of the value of Jaime-Sainz’s assistance.
See U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1(a)(1) & cmt. n.3; Laney, 189 F.3d at 964.
AFFIRMED.
2 16-30248