Juan Arias-Gonzalez v. Jefferson Sessions ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                               NOT FOR PUBLICATION                        FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       AUG 14 2017
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    JUAN JOSE ARIAS-GONZALEZ, AKA                   No.    15-70205
    Juan Carlos Castaneda, AKA Luis Garcia-
    Rodriguez, AKA Juan Amar Gutierrez,             Agency No. A078-461-371
    AKA Jonthon Mandiville Osuna, AKA
    Miguel Angel Portillo, AKA Diego
    Saradegui, AKA Diego Emillio Saradegui,         MEMORANDUM*
    AKA Diego Saradegui-Torres, AKA Jose
    Lozano Zamora,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney
    General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Submitted August 9, 2017**
    Before:      SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    Juan Jose Arias-Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Ecuador, petitions for
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    review of the Board of Immigrations Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
    immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal
    and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction
    under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual
    findings, Silaya v. Mukasey, 
    524 F.3d 1066
    , 1070 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the
    petition for review.
    As to withholding of removal, even if the evidence compels a finding that
    the harm in 1994 rose to the level of persecution, the record does not adequately
    demonstrate a likelihood of future persecution as of the time of the hearing. See
    Nagoulko v. INS, 
    333 F.3d 1012
    , 1018 (9th Cir. 2003) (possibility of future harm
    “too speculative”).
    As to CAT relief, substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that
    Arias-Gonzalez failed to demonstrate it is more likely than not he would be
    tortured if returned to Ecuador. See 
    Silaya, 524 F.3d at 1073
    .
    PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
    2                                    15-70205
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-70205

Filed Date: 8/14/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021